Enhancing the context-aware FOREX market simulation using a parallel elastic network model

[EN] Foreign exchange (FOREX) market is a decentralized global marketplace in which different participants, such as international banks, companies or investors, can buy, sell, exchange and speculate on currencies. This market is considered to be the largest financial market in the world in terms of trading volume. Indeed, the just-in-time price prediction for a currency pair exchange rate (e.g., EUR/USD) provides valuable information for companies and investors as they can take different actions to improve their business. The trading volume in the FOREX market is huge, disperses, in continuous operations (24 h except weekends), and the context significantly affects the exchange rates. This paper introduces a context-aware algorithm to model the behavior of the FOREX Market, called parallel elastic network model (PENM). This algorithm is inspired by natural procedures like the behavior of macromolecules in dissolution. The main results of this work include the possibility to represent the market evolution of up to 21 currency pair, being all connected, thus emulating the real-world FOREX market behavior. Moreover, because the computational needs required are highly costly as the number of currency pairs increases, a hybrid parallelization using several shared memory and message passing algorithms studied on distributed cluster is evaluated to achieve a high-throughput algorithm that answers the real-time constraints of the FOREX market. The PENM is also compared with a vector autoregressive (VAR) model using both a classical statistical measure and a profitability measure. Specifically, the results indicate that PENM outperforms VAR models in terms of quality, achieving up to 930xspeed-up factor compared to traditional R codes using in this field.This work was jointly supported by the Fundación Séneca (Agencia Regional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Región de Murcia) under Grant 20813/PI/18 and by the Spanish MEC and European Commission FEDER under Grants TIN2016-78799-P and TIN2016-80565-R (AEI/FEDER, UE).Contreras, AV.; Llanes, A.; Herrera, FJ.; Navarro, S.; López-Espin, JJ.; Cecilia-Canales, JM. (2020). Enhancing the context-aware FOREX market simulation using a parallel elastic network model. The Journal of Supercomputing. 76(3):2022-2038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-02838-1S20222038763Bahrepour M, Akbarzadeh-T MR, Yaghoobi M, Naghibi-S MB (2011) An adaptive ordered fuzzy time series with application to FOREX. Expert Syst Appl 38(1):475–485Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/ . Accessed 13 Feb 2013Bhattacharyya S, Pictet OV, Zumbach G (2002) Knowledge-intensive genetic discovery in foreign exchange markets. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 6(2):169–181Bank of International Settlements (2016) Triennial central bank survey: foreign exchange turnover in April 2016, BaselCaporale GM, Gil-Alana L, Plastun A (2017) Searching for inefficiencies in exchange rate dynamics. Comput Econ 49(3):405–432De Grauwe P, Markiewicz A (2013) Learning to forecast the exchange rate: two competing approaches. J Int Money Finance 32:42–76Fama E (1970) Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. J Finance 25(2):383–417Fama EF (1965) The behavior of stock-market prices. J Bus 38(1):34–105Fama EF (1970) Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. J Finance 25(2):383–417Fuglebakk E, Reuter N, Hinsen K (2013) Evaluation of protein elastic network models based on an analysis of collective motions. J Chem Theory Comput 9(12):5618–5628Hanssens DM, Parsons LJ, Schultz RL (2003) Market response models: econometric and time series analysis, vol 12. Springer, New YorkKamruzzaman J, Sarker RA (2003) Forecasting of currency exchange rates using ANN: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Neural Networks and Signal Processing, 2003, vol 1. IEEE, pp 793–797Kamruzzaman J, Sarker RA, Ahmad I (2003) SVM based models for predicting foreign currency exchange rates. In: Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2003. ICDM 2003, IEEE, pp. 557–560Karplus M, McCammon JA (2002) Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat Struct Mol Biol 9(9):646–652Kleen A (2015) Intel PMU profiling tools. https://github.com/andikleen/pmu-tools/tree/d70840ba . Accessed 15 Mar 2019Kuo RJ, Chen C, Hwang Y (2001) An intelligent stock trading decision support system through integration of genetic algorithm based fuzzy neural network and artificial neural network. Fuzzy Sets Syst 118(1):21–45LeBaron B, Arthur WB, Palmer R (1999) Time series properties of an artificial stock market. J Econ Dyn Control 23(9):1487–1516Li Q, Chen Y, Wang J, Chen Y, Chen H (2017) Web media and stock markets: a survey and future directions from a big data perspective. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 30:381–399Luetkepohl H (2009) Econometric analysis with vector autoregressive models. In: Belsley DA, Kontoghiorghes EJ (eds) Handbook of computational econometrics. Wiley, New York, pp 281–319Makovskỳ P (2014) Modern approaches to efficient market hypothesis of FOREX—the central European case. Proc Econ Finance 14:397–406Meade N (2002) A comparison of the accuracy of short term foreign exchange forecasting methods. Int J Forecast 18(1):67–83Meese RA, Rogoff K (1983) Empirical exchange rate models of the seventies: do they fit out of sample? J Int Econ 14(1–2):3–24Mockus J, Raudys A (2010) On the efficient-market hypothesis and stock exchange game model. Expert Syst Appl 37(8):5673–5681Nassirtoussi AK, Aghabozorgi S, Wah TY, Ngo DCL (2014) Text mining for market prediction: a systematic review. Expert Syst Appl 41(16):7653–7670Neely C, Weller P, Dittmar R (1997) Is technical analysis in the foreign exchange market profitable? A genetic programming approach. J Financial Quant Anal 32(4):405–426Pincak R (2013) The string prediction models as invariants of time series in the FOREX market. Phys A: Stat Mech Appl 392(24):6414–6426Samuelson PA (2016) Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. In: The World Scientific Handbook of Futures Markets, pp 25–38Sarantis N, Stewart C (1995) Structural, VAR and BVAR models of exchange rate determination: a comparison of their forecasting performance. J Forecast 14(3):201–215Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw 61:85–117Sims CA (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econ: J Econ Soc. 48:1–48Ţiţan AG (2015) The efficient market hypothesis: review of specialized literature and empirical research. Proc Econ Finance 32:442–449Yao J, Tan CL (2000) A case study on using neural networks to perform technical forecasting of FOREX. Neurocomputing 34(1):79–9

Delaying surgery for patients with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection

Not availabl

Safety of hospital discharge before return of bowel function after elective colorectal surgery

© 2020 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons LtdBackground: Ileus is common after colorectal surgery and is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. Identifying features of normal bowel recovery and the appropriateness for hospital discharge is challenging. This study explored the safety of hospital discharge before the return of bowel function. Methods: A prospective, multicentre cohort study was undertaken across an international collaborative network. Adult patients undergoing elective colorectal resection between January and April 2018 were included. The main outcome of interest was readmission to hospital within 30 days of surgery. The impact of discharge timing according to the return of bowel function was explored using multivariable regression analysis. Other outcomes were postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery, measured using the Clavien–Dindo classification system. Results: A total of 3288 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 301 (9·2 per cent) were discharged before the return of bowel function. The median duration of hospital stay for patients discharged before and after return of bowel function was 5 (i.q.r. 4–7) and 7 (6–8) days respectively (P < 0·001). There were no significant differences in rates of readmission between these groups (6·6 versus 8·0 per cent; P = 0·499), and this remained the case after multivariable adjustment for baseline differences (odds ratio 0·90, 95 per cent c.i. 0·55 to 1·46; P = 0·659). Rates of postoperative complications were also similar in those discharged before versus after return of bowel function (minor: 34·7 versus 39·5 per cent; major 3·3 versus 3·4 per cent; P = 0·110). Conclusion: Discharge before return of bowel function after elective colorectal surgery appears to be safe in appropriately selected patients

The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study

AimThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to explore the impact of surgical delays on cancer resectability. This study aimed to compare resectability for colorectal cancer patients undergoing delayed versus non-delayed surgery.MethodsThis was an international prospective cohort study of consecutive colorectal cancer patients with a decision for curative surgery (January-April 2020). Surgical delay was defined as an operation taking place more than 4 weeks after treatment decision, in a patient who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. A subgroup analysis explored the effects of delay in elective patients only. The impact of longer delays was explored in a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was complete resection, defined as curative resection with an R0 margin.ResultsOverall, 5453 patients from 304 hospitals in 47 countries were included, of whom 6.6% (358/5453) did not receive their planned operation. Of the 4304 operated patients without neoadjuvant therapy, 40.5% (1744/4304) were delayed beyond 4 weeks. Delayed patients were more likely to be older, men, more comorbid, have higher body mass index and have rectal cancer and early stage disease. Delayed patients had higher unadjusted rates of complete resection (93.7% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.032) and lower rates of emergency surgery (4.5% vs. 22.5%, P ConclusionOne in 15 colorectal cancer patients did not receive their planned operation during the first wave of COVID-19. Surgical delay did not appear to compromise resectability, raising the hypothesis that any reduction in long-term survival attributable to delays is likely to be due to micro-metastatic disease

Delayed colorectal cancer care during covid-19 pandemic (decor-19). Global perspective from an international survey

Background The widespread nature of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been unprecedented. We sought to analyze its global impact with a survey on colorectal cancer (CRC) care during the pandemic. Methods The impact of COVID-19 on preoperative assessment, elective surgery, and postoperative management of CRC patients was explored by a 35-item survey, which was distributed worldwide to members of surgical societies with an interest in CRC care. Respondents were divided into two comparator groups: 1) ‘delay’ group: CRC care affected by the pandemic; 2) ‘no delay’ group: unaltered CRC practice. Results A total of 1,051 respondents from 84 countries completed the survey. No substantial differences in demographics were found between the ‘delay’ (745, 70.9%) and ‘no delay’ (306, 29.1%) groups. Suspension of multidisciplinary team meetings, staff members quarantined or relocated to COVID-19 units, units fully dedicated to COVID-19 care, personal protective equipment not readily available were factors significantly associated to delays in endoscopy, radiology, surgery, histopathology and prolonged chemoradiation therapy-to-surgery intervals. In the ‘delay’ group, 48.9% of respondents reported a change in the initial surgical plan and 26.3% reported a shift from elective to urgent operations. Recovery of CRC care was associated with the status of the outbreak. Practicing in COVID-free units, no change in operative slots and staff members not relocated to COVID-19 units were statistically associated with unaltered CRC care in the ‘no delay’ group, while the geographical distribution was not. Conclusions Global changes in diagnostic and therapeutic CRC practices were evident. Changes were associated with differences in health-care delivery systems, hospital’s preparedness, resources availability, and local COVID-19 prevalence rather than geographical factors. Strategic planning is required to optimize CRC care

Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseBackground: 80% of individuals with cancer will require a surgical procedure, yet little comparative data exist on early outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared postoperative outcomes in breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer surgery in hospitals worldwide, focusing on the effect of disease stage and complications on postoperative mortality. Methods: This was a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for primary breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer requiring a skin incision done under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression determined relationships within three-level nested models of patients within hospitals and countries. Hospital-level infrastructure effects were explored with three-way mediation analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03471494. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 958 patients from 428 hospitals in 82 countries (high income 9106 patients, 31 countries; upper-middle income 2721 patients, 23 countries; or lower-middle income 4131 patients, 28 countries). Patients in LMICs presented with more advanced disease compared with patients in high-income countries. 30-day mortality was higher for gastric cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 3·72, 95% CI 1·70–8·16) and for colorectal cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (4·59, 2·39–8·80) and upper-middle-income countries (2·06, 1·11–3·83). No difference in 30-day mortality was seen in breast cancer. The proportion of patients who died after a major complication was greatest in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (6·15, 3·26–11·59) and upper-middle-income countries (3·89, 2·08–7·29). Postoperative death after complications was partly explained by patient factors (60%) and partly by hospital or country (40%). The absence of consistently available postoperative care facilities was associated with seven to 10 more deaths per 100 major complications in LMICs. Cancer stage alone explained little of the early variation in mortality or postoperative complications. Interpretation: Higher levels of mortality after cancer surgery in LMICs was not fully explained by later presentation of disease. The capacity to rescue patients from surgical complications is a tangible opportunity for meaningful intervention. Early death after cancer surgery might be reduced by policies focusing on strengthening perioperative care systems to detect and intervene in common complications. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit

Effects of hospital facilities on patient outcomes after cancer surgery: an international, prospective, observational study

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 licenseBackground: Early death after cancer surgery is higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with in high-income countries, yet the impact of facility characteristics on early postoperative outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hospital infrastructure, resource availability, and processes on early outcomes after cancer surgery worldwide. Methods: A multimethods analysis was performed as part of the GlobalSurg 3 study—a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study of patients who had surgery for breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day major complication rates. Potentially beneficial hospital facilities were identified by variable selection to select those associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted outcomes were determined using generalised estimating equations to account for patient characteristics and country-income group, with population stratification by hospital. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and April 23, 2019, facility-level data were collected for 9685 patients across 238 hospitals in 66 countries (91 hospitals in 20 high-income countries; 57 hospitals in 19 upper-middle-income countries; and 90 hospitals in 27 low-income to lower-middle-income countries). The availability of five hospital facilities was inversely associated with mortality: ultrasound, CT scanner, critical care unit, opioid analgesia, and oncologist. After adjustment for case-mix and country income group, hospitals with three or fewer of these facilities (62 hospitals, 1294 patients) had higher mortality compared with those with four or five (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·85 [95% CI 2·58–5·75]; p<0·0001), with excess mortality predominantly explained by a limited capacity to rescue following the development of major complications (63·0% vs 82·7%; OR 0·35 [0·23–0·53]; p<0·0001). Across LMICs, improvements in hospital facilities would prevent one to three deaths for every 100 patients undergoing surgery for cancer. Interpretation: Hospitals with higher levels of infrastructure and resources have better outcomes after cancer surgery, independent of country income. Without urgent strengthening of hospital infrastructure and resources, the reductions in cancer-associated mortality associated with improved access will not be realised. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research